[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Trying to break the anaconda/distro embrace
- From: Peter Jones <pjones redhat com>
- To: Discussion of Development and Customization of the Red Hat Linux Installer <anaconda-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Trying to break the anaconda/distro embrace
- Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:25:04 -0500
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 16:01 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 03:50:58PM -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > Does this make sense to people and seem like it would help some in
> > developing changes as well as doing testing for anaconda?
>
> Yes, makes sense. You know my constant question, though, which is: how does
> this work with install classes? They're highly tied to both anaconda version
> *and* to the specifics of what they're installing.
Well, it's certainly possible to describe them in a standardized file
format (a la comps). The real question is how to make generic
configuration of e.g. "installation keys" (think: registration numbers
that also pick install classes automagically).
--
Peter
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]