[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: RFE- kickstart and package selection support for livecd installs
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>
- To: Discussion of Development and Customization of the Red Hat Linux Installer <anaconda-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: RFE- kickstart and package selection support for livecd installs
- Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2007 16:07:39 -0400
On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 14:57 -0500, Douglas McClendon wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:50 -0500, Douglas McClendon wrote:
> >> After having fully grokked the livecd-creator code, it occurs to me that it may
> >> not be such a completely crazy idea to bring full package selection and even
> >> kickstart support to the livecd installer.
> >>
> >> The main constraint of course is having access to the 'core' or full repo,
> >> either via network or existing disk filesystem.
> >
> > As it stands now, you can pretty much already say "install from here
> > rather than doing the live image" and things work. The liveinst script
> > just kind of hides that from you. Once I get repo selection within
> > anaconda itself a little cleaned up (on my todo list for the next week
> > or so), it becomes a lot more feasible to export that for others to
> > use.
> >
> > Kickstart should pretty much already be able to work"
>
> Yeah, what I was saying would lessen the impact on pulling stuff from the
> network and installing stuff. But it wasn't really occurring to me that you can
> use anaconda+network+kickstart as is already.
>
> I suppose a minor addition, (if it's not there already), would be to invoke
> anaconda automatically if ks= is on the kernel commandline. So that you get
> behaviour comparable to the traditional installation media.
Yeah. This could be done from the livecd initscript I guess. I'm not
sold one way or another. If someone really cares, I'll probably do it.
Else, it'll probably stay as it is :-)
> >> The key aspect of feasibility I see, is how similar the task would be to the
> >> existing livecd-creator base-on-iso code path. I.e. that code path already
> >> takes as input, a livecd type installation, and then effectively applies a
> >> kickstart configuration to it.
> >
> > I don't know that the base-on bits are really that interesting... more
> > that you either want to
> > a) make changes after the system is installed
> > b) if you made changes to the live image, have them preserved on the
> > install
> That's pretty much just a matter of using /dev/mapper/live-rw rather than
> /dev/live-osimg (and unfutzing things like /etc/rc.d/init.d/fedora-live)
The latter being the hard part unless you require the initscript to be
"undoable" :-/
Jeremy
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]