[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Dependency checking algorithm
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>
- To: Discussion of Development and Customization of the Red Hat Linux Installer <anaconda-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Dependency checking algorithm
- Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2007 11:21:59 -0400
On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 16:57 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 11:14 +0200, Alexander Todorov wrote:
> >> I am looking at the horribly slow installation when packages are
> >> specified explicitly (look for an old e-mail from Jeffrey Law:
> >> Interesting anaconda/yum performance issue).
> >
> > Jeff then put together a patch for yum based on where I pointed him that
> > should have gotten this back to where it "should" be. And that's been
> > in for a while.
>
> Where can I find/test that patch? Any relevant BZ?
> Which version of anaconda/yum?
yum patch only and it was in the thread you referenced :) And should
have gone in around the same time, whatever version of yum that makes
things
> I am not quite sure what are the differences but it seems strange.
> Why do we have 2 different function/code paths that essentially do the
> same thing, install requested packages?
Old API vs new API. But removing the old would break old callers, which
we don't really like doing.
Jeremy
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]