[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH] De-kudzuification of anaconda, stage 1
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- To: Discussion of Development and Customization of the Red Hat Linux Installer <anaconda-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] De-kudzuification of anaconda, stage 1
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 14:58:09 -0500
Jeremy Katz (katzj redhat com) said:
> > There are only so many exceptions you logically want to handle, though -
> > if the daemon isn't there or isn't responding, it's logically no different
> > than some command not existing in the install image, or parted crashing, etc.
>
> It's far better to catch an exception and log that there was an error
> writing out a network config than to crash in the middle of writing it
> out.
Technically, this is in network device list generation, anyway. You can
continue with just no network devices, but the net effect for the user is
pretty much the same.
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]