[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [PATCH (stage1)] Rework module loading
- From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
- To: Discussion of Development and Customization of the Red Hat Linux Installer <anaconda-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH (stage1)] Rework module loading
- Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:30:28 -0500
Jeremy Katz (katzj redhat com) said:
> > > While not great or perfect, it's commonly used. It's also used quite a
> > > bit for people that want to load drivers in a specific order so their
> > > drives show up with specific names.
> > >
> > > Also, it looks like we lost the late load of modules for loading the
> > > various fiberchannel stuff last.
> >
> > Drive ordering is ephemeral. LABEL=/UUID= is your friend.
>
> LABEL/UUID don't really help when you have blank disks that you're just
> installing on for the first time...
It's not like the UI would be that much better with the FC disks loaded later -
there would still be 5 billion of them in the dropdown. They could certainly
be blacklisted.
> > > Crap, that's a pretty sizable overhead. I wonder if there's a chance of
> > > getting some support in module-init-tools for some form of "keeping
> > > modules around in a compressed form" :-/
> >
> > You can gzip modules. That cuts it down to 14.9MB. Note that there's no
> > firmware on either this or the F8 disc, and that's not going to be compressed
> > once it's added.
>
> gzip it is then! And actually, the firmware can be compressed, at least
> as long as we're using our own firmware loader. And then if we want to
> switch away from our firmware loading, then we can add support for
> compressed firmware to the udev firmware loader.
Once you add all the qlogic & wireless firmware, it's not going
to be small even when compressed.
Bill
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]