[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Installing both x86_64 and i386 RPMS on a x86_64 system
- From: "Brian Long" <briandlong gmail com>
- To: "Discussion of Development and Customization of the Red Hat Linux Installer" <anaconda-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Installing both x86_64 and i386 RPMS on a x86_64 system
- Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 11:21:16 -0400
On 3/23/07, James Pearson <james-p moving-picture com> wrote:
I have my own internal customised installation tree for CentOS 4 that is
used for installs over NFS - I've added extra RPMS to my x86_64 distro
and updated comps.xml and re-generated the hdlist files.
This works fine in most cases - except when I have both x86_64 and i386
versions of the same RPM - only the x86_64 package gets installed (or if
there is only an i386 RPM, then this gets installed OK).
I know this works fine for x86_64/i386 RPMS that are part of the default
distro, so I'm obviously missing something somewhere ...
Anyone know how I make sure both x86_64 and i386 RPMS get installed?
If you look at the original comps.xml from Red Hat, you'll see a few groups are tagged with <biarchonly>true</biarchonly>. Make sure you have a comps group defined with all your biarch RPMs and the above tag included in the definition. For example, "Compatibility Arch Support" is a group in RHEL 3 that has the biarchonly tag.
/Brian/
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]