[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: loader/stage2 interaction
- From: Chris Lumens <clumens redhat com>
- To: anaconda-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: loader/stage2 interaction
- Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 09:11:12 -0400
> > I think we could make RHupdates work in a world where nothing is mounted
> > at the end of loader, but only if we are all convinced we should keep
> > this feature. It wouldn't take much to convince me. I think updates=
> > is a really flexible option that's not tied to a single installation
> > method, and I like that.
>
> RHupdates is from the days before updates= and our flexibility there.
> The more I think about it, the more I think that its time is past
Agreed, we can use the more flexible method for all cases. I'll write
this down on my list of things to do on rewrite.
- Chris
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]