Re: [PATCH] write yum repos used during install under /etc/yum.repo.d/

[Radek Vykydal <rvykydal redhat com>]

On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 10:52 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 16:26 +0200, Radek Vykydal wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > > 
> > > Good morning,
> > > anyone to review and comment on this patch please?
> > > 
> > 
> > The patch seems OK to me, but the policy of preference of repos
> > after installation should be thought about. I think
> > that the added install repos shouldn't be the preferred one -
> > I'd rather even disable it by default because disabled repo wouldn't
> > do any harm, and yet it could be useful.
> > 
> > Option of controlling the preference with values of 'cost' seems too
> > fragile to me in this case. (Maybe we could let(force) the user set the
> > preference by a new (ks) option if he wants to have the repo
> > enabled after install.)
> > 
> > My view is based only on wild guesses about typical install scenarios.
> > 
> 
> Why would you add a repo to your ks.cfg unless you wanted it to be
> preferred?
> 

My concerns above was regarding the install tree repo (with baseurl of
install method url) which is (for http/https/ftp methods) added
to /etc/yum.repos.d by the patch, not repos added with "repo" to ks.cfg.

> -sv
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
> Anaconda-devel-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list