Jeremy Katz wrote:
On Sat, 2008-02-02 at 07:34 +0900, John Summerfield wrote:
The problem is that the word "minimum" is so heavily loaded (and differently loaded) that if you use it, you make no one happy. So, you pick different terms so that people can have the "minimum" they are looking for Jeremy
So propose something better; it seems the existing names cause endless confusion.
_I_ don't see that "minimum" is so confusing, if needs be it could be further described as "nothing less can be maintained."
That would also be a good criterion to help on deciding what goes in. -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa coco merseine nu Z1aaaaaaa coco merseine nu -- Advice http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375 You cannot reply off-list:-)