Re: pungi/mkisofs for ppc on x64

[Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>]

John Summerfield (debian herakles homelinux org) said: 
> We're making process, but pardon me if I ask "why?" again. I can understand 
> that someone might have chosen to implement that way, but is this choice 
> necessary? Could binaries running on Intellish hardware not do the needed 
> work?

Becuase otherwise involves writing really grody code that uses elfutils
to parse out all the DT_NEEDEDs. We also run various things like ldconfig,
icon caching, fc-cache, im module listings, etc. in the root for the
install images.

Bill