[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [PATCH] Use yum.rpmUtils.arch.canonArch instead of rhpl
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>
- To: Discussion of Development and Customization of the Red Hat Linux Installer <anaconda-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use yum.rpmUtils.arch.canonArch instead of rhpl
- Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2008 20:01:18 -0400
On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 13:40 -1000, David Cantrell wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2008, at 3:11 AM, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 22:58 -1000, David Cantrell wrote:
> >> Here's a patch to replace the rhpl.arch.canonArch stuff with the same
> >> thing from yum.rpmUtils. Not sure if we can use it the same way, but
> >> it didn't complain when I used it this way.
> >
> > We should really avoid importing yum in iutil as that will cause
> > problems for other backends. Although we could arguably just move the
> > functionality into yuminstall as that's really the only place it's
> > relevant
>
> We also call it from anaconda, backend.py, and livecd.py. Not sure
> where writeRpmPlatform() should live at this point.
Well, for one thing, the method is poorly named at this point. We don't
actually *write* /etc/rpm/platform. Just /etc/rpm/macros. So the need
from anaconda should be able to be handled by us just setting the macros
ourselves via rpm.addMacro(). The call from livecd.py shouldn't be
needed as the live image should have things "right" already and if not,
we should fix it. And the call from backend.py is probably due to
moving things around at one point
Actually as I think outloud... I'm halfway tempted to just rip the
method out entirely and file an rpm bug if things go badly
Jeremy
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]