[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [PATCH] removal of libdhcp
- From: Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>
- To: Discussion of Development and Customization of the Red Hat Linux Installer <anaconda-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] removal of libdhcp
- Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 14:08:14 -0400
On Wed, 2008-05-21 at 07:48 -1000, David Cantrell wrote:
> On May 21, 2008, at 5:50 AM, Elliot Peele wrote:
> > What about distros that don't use NetworkManager? Will there be a fall
> > back? If we are using NetworkManager with Anaconda will it still able
> > able to generate "classic" network configuration?
>
>
> Personally, I'd rather not allow users the option to create a classic
> set of ifcfg-* files if we are doing NM by default. As long as it's
> an option, people will still use it, which means we'll still have to
> support multiple ways of configuring network devices on the target
> system. If we're going NM for everything, it should be NM for
> everything.
Generating ifcfg-* files is still sane with NetworkManager, though. It
uses them for the system-settings backend
Jeremy
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]