Bill Nottingham wrote:
Chris Lumens (clumens redhat com) said:libdhcp replaced libpump around F-5 or so. It's been nothing butWhat was wrong with libpump?The initial motivation for replacing libpump with libdhcp was that libpump had no support for IPv6 and that support was a requirement for RHEL5.... and that it was an entirely separate codebase for DHCP which means that the installer would have different success and failure characteristics than the rebooted system.
For my journey to work, an electric bicycle is close to ideal, it's not very far and I mostly don't carry much.
However, my wife needs a car, she carries more and public transport's not a realistic option.
Whatever the installed system's requirements might be (and it's the mobility of my laptop that brought nm down), I'd have thought Anaconda's requirements to be fairly basic, more akin to the bicycle than the car.
I do think keeping Anaconda's overall size (RAM usage) down is important. -- Cheers John -- spambait 1aaaaaaa coco merseine nu Z1aaaaaaa coco merseine nu -- Advice http://webfoot.com/advice/email.top.php http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/kb/555375 You cannot reply off-list:-)