[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [PATCH] 470951 - be more careful around xfs
- From: Chris Lumens <clumens redhat com>
- To: anaconda-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] 470951 - be more careful around xfs
- Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 15:11:25 -0500
> > diff --git a/fsset.py b/fsset.py
> > index 40eb0d2..e216d9a 100644
> > --- a/fsset.py
> > +++ b/fsset.py
> > @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ class xfsFileSystem(FileSystemType):
> > self.maxSizeMB = 16 * 1024 * 1024
> > self.maxLabelChars = 12
> > self.supported = -1
> > - if not os.path.exists("/sbin/mkfs.xfs") and not os.path.exists("/usr/sbin/mkfs.xfs"):
> > + if not os.path.exists("/sbin/mkfs.xfs") and not os.path.exists("/usr/sbin/mkfs.xfs") and not os.path.exists("/usr/sbin/xfs_admin"):
>
> If you want to make that line any shorter, mkfs.xfs should always exist
> in /sbin, not /usr/sbin, just FWIW.
We do this same sort of thing several places in anaconda. It's probably
in there because of how we move things around in upd-instroot, and no
one can remember where binaries are vs. where binaries are supposed to
be.
- Chris
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]