Re: PATCH: do not run multipath stuff when not nescessary

[Hans de Goede <hdegoede redhat com>]

Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 03 2009, Hans de Goede said:
> > While working on dmraid I noticed that the multipath stuff gets run when 
> > it shouldn't, this is because the test changed in the patch below assumes 
> > that not has a lower precedence then and, which it has not, so the not 
> > only applies to one part of the and, making the test wrong.
>
> We don't want to return immediately if mpList is None, though -- that means 
> that we haven't been through startMpath() before and thus haven't set 
> things up.  Maybe more clear would be

Ah, ok so I misunderstood the purpose of the check, in that case never mind it 
is fine as is.

Regards,

Hans