[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Patch set to let us default to ext4 as the rootfs
- From: Chris Lumens <clumens redhat com>
- To: anaconda-devel-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Patch set to let us default to ext4 as the rootfs
- Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:33:28 -0500
> Two patches so that we can switch to using ext4 as the default fs, at least
> for now. The first is a fix for live installs so that ext4 is acceptable
> for them and also cleaning up an error message I added after string freeze
> last time.
>
> The second is the actual guts of switching -- doing it there rather than
> deeper so that we don't switch /boot.
>
> Tested with a live install and was going fine before my kvm guest locked
> up, but that's an unrelated problem :)
There are a couple other places in anaconda where we have lists of
ext3/ext2. I wonder if it's worth adding ext4 to those places as well.
For instance, look at validateFsTypes in partedUtils.py:
goodTypes = ['ext3', 'ext2']
Or DiskSet.exceptionDisks:
func = lambda p: p.is_active() and not p.get_flag(parted.PARTITION_RAID) and not p.get_f lag(parted.PARTITION_LVM) and p.fs_type.name in ["ext3", "ext2", "fat16", "fat32"]
Does ext4 just silently end up looking like ext3 in these places?
Otherwise, this set looks fine to me. However I am a bit concerned
about any future plans we may have in moving to btrfs by default. That
could be a ways off, but do we want to move for a release or two only to
move to a new filesystem again so soon?
- Chris
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]