[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Write out NM_CONTROLLED=no for NICs used for FCoE

From: Bill Nottingham <notting redhat com>
To: Discussion of Development and Customization of the Red Hat Linux Installer <anaconda-devel-list redhat com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Write out NM_CONTROLLED=no for NICs used for FCoE
Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 11:34:36 -0400

Hans de Goede (hdegoede redhat com) said: 
> No, because as I've explained before (and I really wish people would start
> understanding this) FcOE is not a network based storage protocol.

The one thing I haven't heard clearly answered - is it a valid configuration
to have a FCoE-enabled NIC that *also* has an IP for other outgoing traffic?

If so, we *do* need more than NM_CONTROLLED=no. If not... we don't.

Bill

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Write out NM_CONTROLLED=no for NICs used for FCoE
  - From: Hans de Goede

References:
- [PATCH 1/2] Write out NM_CONTROLLED=no for NICs used for FCoE
  - From: Hans de Goede
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Write out NM_CONTROLLED=no for NICs used for FCoE
  - From: Bill Nottingham
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] Write out NM_CONTROLLED=no for NICs used for FCoE
  - From: Hans de Goede

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]