Re: [PATCH] Log yum messages.

[Jeremy Katz <katzj redhat com>]

On Thursday, June 18 2009, Radek Vykydal said:
> Jeremy Katz wrote:
>> While this looks like it'll work, it also looks like it might be a  
>> little fragile.  I wonder if it's worth trying to get a better API in  
>> place that we could use to pass what we want to set.  Alternately, we  
>> could just not use the base class's logging setup at all and do it all  
>> ourselves
>>
>
> You are right, there is not much gain in calling base class's logging  
> setup, I am sending new version of patch that doesn't do it. As for  
> better API, maybe addition of optional logging configuration files to  
> yum (for yum and yum.verbose loggers) could be worthy, but I don't feel  
> like diving into it right now.

Cool, this looks okay

Jeremy