Re: [PATCH - storage]: Fix booty for dmraid

[Chris Lumens <clumens redhat com>]

> Booty was expecting the xxxxxxx part of /dev/xxxxxx paths instead of
> new storage device names, this patch fixes this, making booty work on
> dmraid with the new storage code.

I really hate having to pass a storage instance around all over the
place, but I don't see what else we can do right now.  I don't think we
can fix that until we get rid of util.py and deal with things as objects
instead of strings.

So, go ahead and commit this and we'll make things cleaner when we take
the chainsaw to booty next.

Also, thanks for testing a non-dmraid case to make sure it all worked.
This is touchy code.

- Chris