[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Possible enumeration approach
- From: Joel Granados <jgranado redhat com>
- To: Hans de Goede <hdegoede redhat com>
- Cc: Anaconda Devel <anaconda-devel-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Possible enumeration approach
- Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 09:46:25 +0200
On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 08:21:24PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
>
> On 05/22/2009 06:35 PM, Joel Granados wrote:
>> Hey list.
>>
>>
>> This is a hack that hans proposed for the parted issue. Don't see this
>> causing any problems.
>> clumens: what do you think of this for a temporary solution for the
>> enumeration issue?
>>
>> Comments appreciated.
>>
>
> Why do all the
> + if (ped_disk_enumerate_on())
> + ped_disk_toggle_do_enumerate();
> +
>
> Everywhere ? The whole idea behind this method was that the application/
> library using libparted would call ped_disk_toggle_do_enumerate() and
> thus control if things are renumbered or not.
This patch was a proof of concept. I put those in parted/parted.c
because I wanted to see what effect it would have in other parted
execution paths _with_ the enumeration function but partitions not
enumerated. Thats why I turned back off.
These are not part of the final patch (sorry for posting them). The
files of the final patch will only include libparted/disk.c. The
behavior of the parted command will not be affected.
Regards
--
Joel Andres Granados
Brno, Czech Republic, Red Hat.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]