[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/4] Do not assume we found a module in addOption() in loader/modules.c

From: Chris Lumens <clumens redhat com>
To: anaconda-devel-list redhat com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Do not assume we found a module in addOption() in loader/modules.c
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:52:49 -0400

> Avoid SIGSEGV in addOption() in loader/modules.c.  Just because found
> does not equal 0 does not mean we found the module requested.

Can you explain what's going on in this patch and function?  Got a bug
number?

The other three patches look good.

- Chris

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 2/4] Do not assume we found a module in addOption() in loader/modules.c
  - From: David Cantrell

References:
- [master] fixes for s390x
  - From: David Cantrell
- [PATCH 2/4] Do not assume we found a module in addOption() in loader/modules.c
  - From: David Cantrell

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]