Re: Network: port of rhel patches to master

[Radek Vykydal <rvykydal redhat com>]

On 02/28/2011 07:00 PM, Chris Lumens wrote:
> > Kickstart patches and [03, 10-13/13] may need a second eye,
> > other stuff should be safe, almost the same as on rhel6-branch.
> >      
> The kickstart patches look fine.

They are against F15, to push them on master, I should
probably wait for F16 classes, no?

> Is this networking behavior documented anywhere and if not, could you
> work on that?  One problem I always have in reviewing these patches is I
> can no longer keep track of how things are supposed to act.
>
>    

I am keeping track of it here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Network#kickstart

I want to update wikis (boot opts, kickstart), I suppose
they should reflect last release, not rawhide, right?
I am a bit hesitating to update Installation Guide and
wikis only to change them in the next release (F16)
because I don't think these changes can make it into F15,
but it should be done anyway I guess.

I will use this 6.1 Installation Guide update as base for
Fedora update:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=679104

Thanks for the review,

Radek