[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Not at axp-list, please (was Re: QT non-open source!)
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert Uytterhoeven cs kuleuven ac be>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Not at axp-list, please (was Re: QT non-open source!)
- Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 17:28:50 +0200 (CEST)
On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Christopher Curtis wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 1998, Christopher C Chimelis wrote:
> > Fine. Just for my info, is the axp-list supposed to be Redhat-specific
> > or AXP-related in general? I've never been clear on this.
>
> I don't think there are any clear lines. RedHat has the only official
> Alpha distribution so the two items were pretty much synonymous. However,
> I don't think it would be in the spirit of Linux or free software for this
> list to be RedHat specific. OTOH, RedHat does sponsor this list and most
> people who first find the list are probably RedHat users. Personally, I
> would consider this an Alpha/AXP list with a *heavy* RedHat slant.
Are there `better' Linux/AXP lists for non-RedHat (aka Debian 2.0) users? I'm
not really interested in the distributions, just in the kernel.
I found this one on a Linux/AXP webpage.
Greetings,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven Geert.Uytterhoeven@cs.kuleuven.ac.be
Wavelets, Linux/{m68k~Amiga,PPC~CHRP} http://www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~geert/
Department of Computer Science -- Katholieke Universiteit Leuven -- Belgium
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]