[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Multia 5.2 Out of Memory
- From: Paul Tomblin <ptomblin xcski com>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Multia 5.2 Out of Memory
- Date: Mon, 30 Nov 1998 19:40:00 -0500
Quoting Mark Conway Wirt (mark@intrepid.net):
> On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 06:54:50PM -0500, Mark Conway Wirt wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 30, 1998 at 12:37:35PM -0500, Dave Beck wrote:
> > > I have 64mb in all my udb boxen. They all netboot and use nfs root
> > > filesystems. I routinely compile kernels and other software while
> > > running X. Occasionally they hit swap during such a session, but
> > > for the most part, they are swap free and perform rather well for
> > > being completely diskless.
I have 96Mb, X, approximately 18 xterms open, Netscape (running on my Intel
machine, display set to the UDB), inn handling 4 simultaneous news feeds and
three news readers (me, my wife and my step daughter), majordomo (6 mailing
lists), a bunch of sendmail processes running, apache (100 hits a day),
usually a few javac or egcs compiles going, 2 or 3 vim sessions, etc.
Everything is fine, hardly ever crashes.
> And speaking of swap: When my laptop swaps (IDE), the machine becomes
> unusable. When the UDB swaps, it just slows things down a bit.
>
> Is SCSI *that* much better, or does one expect the architecture of the UBD
> to be superior to a similar-vintage Pentium box?
I think it's the SCSI. I've had the load average briefly go up over 200
(during a HIPCRIME newgroup/rmgroup attack), but the system stayed up and
nothing crashed except inn (too many file handles open).
--
Paul Tomblin, not speaking for anybody.
"NEW! Microsoft(R) Knees97(tm) - now walking will be more fun, jumping will
be more productive, etc etc. ... I think I'll wait for Gnees instead" - John Dow
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]