[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Is XL300 or EBP41-AN any good?
- From: Robb Romans <rr44607 swt edu>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Cc: Bruce Allen <ballen dirac phys uwm edu>
- Subject: Re: Is XL300 or EBP41-AN any good?
- Date: Tue, 1 Dec 1998 23:48:56 -0600 (CST)
Just as a data point, I paid $890 for my XL300, new, with WinNT 4.0. Came
with the usual stuff--i.e. 1GB Narrow Fireball, Millennium I/2MB, Tulip
10-base-T, 2X SCSI cdrom, explosion-proof case, etc. Great Lakes
Computers, www.glcomp.com, ask for Kathy.
As a side note, RH 5.2 installed fine, with the updated ramdisk, and the
existing MILO installed from 5.1. Only problem was the fscking date got
set to 2018 on lots of files, even though I started the install from a
running 5.1 system. The cool little script to fix that posted here didn't
work on the symlinks.
Can someone tell me what point to bail out to a VC to change the date
during the install, and exactly what command to use?
Thanks,
Robb
--
Robb Romans
Southwest Texas State University
reply to rr44607@swt.edu
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]