[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Possibly a stupid question about 21164/21064 instruction diffs.



Richard Henderson wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Dec 30, 1998 at 04:34:07PM -0500, Alvin Starr wrote:
> > I have a couple of binaries that have been generateed for a 21164. This is
> > a problem since at this point I have a number of 21064/66 systems that I
> > do not wish to trash.
> 
> There are no 21164 vs 21064 instruction differences.
> 

Sure ???? What about Byte/Word extension (BWX) instructions ?? I thought
this is only in EV5, EV56, PCA56 and up (>= 21164x). (IMPLVER = 1)

However, does gcc/egcs ever use those ??


Greetings,


Joachim



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index] []