[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Possibly a stupid question about 21164/21064 instruction diffs.
- From: Joachim Wesner <joachim wesner frankfurt netsurf de>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Possibly a stupid question about 21164/21064 instruction diffs.
- Date: Wed, 30 Dec 1998 22:16:17 +0100
Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 1998 at 04:34:07PM -0500, Alvin Starr wrote:
> > I have a couple of binaries that have been generateed for a 21164. This is
> > a problem since at this point I have a number of 21064/66 systems that I
> > do not wish to trash.
>
> There are no 21164 vs 21064 instruction differences.
>
Sure ???? What about Byte/Word extension (BWX) instructions ?? I thought
this is only in EV5, EV56, PCA56 and up (>= 21164x). (IMPLVER = 1)
However, does gcc/egcs ever use those ??
Greetings,
Joachim
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]