Re: olwm?

[Rui-Tao Dong ~{6-HpLN~} <rdong internetMCI com>]

>>>>> "larry" == Larry Snyder <larrys@lexis-nexis.com> writes:

 larry> Hi all -- I may be an anachronism, but having played with CDE,
 larry> Blackbox, fvwm, fvwm95, I still prefer olwm.  It's reasonably
 larry> small, predictable, and above all, STABLE.  Before I launch
 larry> into the investigation of whether it even CAN be built for
 larry> Alpha, I thought I'd see if anyone knows if it's already been
 larry> done and where the binaries/patched sources might live.  I
 larry> found raw source on ftp.x.org, but it will be far beyond my
 larry> programming capabilities if they require much help.  Given
 larry> that this is a 1994 (AFAIK) release, will there be issues
 larry> relating to building it under R6?  I've obviously got a lot
 larry> more questions than answers here.  Clues, anyone?  TIA, -ls-

That is what I use (olvwm autually)!  Building one isn't easy.
(Anyone has a binary for cygwin32?)  I got the xview rpm from Redhat
contrib.

-- 

Rui-Tao Dong ~{6-HpLN~}	<rdong@cwixmail.com>, Mission Viejo, California