[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Possibly a stupid question about 21164/21064 instruction diffs.
- From: Richard Henderson <rth cygnus com>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Possibly a stupid question about 21164/21064 instruction diffs.
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1998 00:58:49 -0800
On Wed, Dec 30, 1998 at 10:16:17PM +0100, Joachim Wesner wrote:
> > There are no 21164 vs 21064 instruction differences.
> >
> Sure ???? What about Byte/Word extension (BWX) instructions ?? I thought
> this is only in EV5, EV56, PCA56 and up (>= 21164x). (IMPLVER = 1)
You should have read the next line concerning 21164a.
EV56 implements BWX, plain old EV5 does not.
> However, does gcc/egcs ever use those ??
Sure, -mcpu=ev56, or at compiler configure time use alphaev56-*.
This is probably just egcs and gcc 2.8.
r~
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]