[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: 2.1.x + AHA2940UW + 164LX = unstable?
- From: Michal Jaegermann <michal ellpspace math ualberta ca>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Cc: hirsch instrumental com
- Subject: Re: 2.1.x + AHA2940UW + 164LX = unstable?
- Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 21:05:36 -0600 (MDT)
>
> I've seen sporatic messages about mystery hang ups
> with late dev kernels on Alpha.
Adaptec has more than its share of quirks. Depending on a particular
one card it may run fine or it may do various unspeakable things.
It is also **very sensitive** on a proper termination and do not
count that auto-termination will work.
Saying all that Doug Ledford produced much improved Adaptec drivers
which are available from ftp://ftp.dialnet.net/pub/linux/aic7xxx/.
I do not remember which version is in 2.1.102. You may want to check
and you definitely want to update if you are running one of "stock"
kernels.
> 3. Are the latest Alan Cox/2.0.X maintained kernels more solid
> on this hardware?
An experience with Adaptecs on Intel is also very checkered one.
--mj
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]