[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: 2.1 kernels on SX164?
- From: Peter Rye <prye picu-sgh demon co uk>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Cc: axp-list redhat com, recipient list not shown: ;
- Subject: Re: 2.1 kernels on SX164?
- Date: Sun, 31 May 1998 09:26:33 +0100
>>>>> "Don" == Don Crimbchin <djc2@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:
Don> Peter Rye wrote:
>> >>>>> "Quant-X" == Quant-X Alpha Linux Support <stefan@sime.com>
>> writes:
>>
>> This should be done for you if you "make boot". I wonder if he just
>> did "make vmlinux" or similar?
>>
Don> Well, I thought I used "make boot". I untarred the sources and
Don> patched them again yet again, and ran "make boot" again, and this
Don> time kernel managed to load. I'm really not sure what I did
Don> different.
Don> Althought the kernel loads now, it gives me lots (LOTS!) of errors
Don> to the console like this:
Don> CPU[0]: where [fffffc000031735c] glocked[1] gicnt[1] licnt[1]
Don> One rather important thing i forgot to mention--(because I thought
Don> the problem was with MILO, rather than the kernel) when I was
Don> building the kernel, I got two parse errors in ide-probe.c. (I
Don> have IDE, not SCSI).
Don> The parse errors were at lines 531 and 696
Don> devices/block/ide-probe.c
Don> 531: #if (DEBUG_SPINLOCK > 0) 532: printk("hwgroup(%s) spinlock is
Don> %p\n", hwif->name, &hwgroup->spinlock); /* FIXME */ 533: #endif
Did you comment out "SMP = 1" in the top level Makefile? (Assuming your
alpha is a uniprocessor machine).
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]