[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: 164LX/AWE32 sound problems
- From: "Adam C. Powell, IV" <adam powell nist gov>
- To: Michal Jaegermann <michal ellpspace math ualberta ca>, Cool Cats <axp-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: 164LX/AWE32 sound problems
- Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 11:16:56 -0500
Hello Michal,
Thanks for all of your help the other day. The problem was not the
symbol names- they're supposed to have version numbers in the modules
and not in the kernel, this is handled by the modutils. The problem
seems to have been dependencies. And I have a new sound problem
below...
First on dependencies, I repeated an exercise I tried a week ago (didn't
work then): poked around in the modules directory, installing random
modules until one fit, and got somewhere:
insmod soundcore
insmod soundlow
insmod sound
insmod uart401
insmod sb [options]
insmod awe_wave
When done in the right order, it all worked!! The only problem is this
is not the *right* way to do things. The first three insmods should be
replaced with
modprobe sound
and it should all work. But it doesn't. I mean, modprobe sound (after
reboot) works, but insmod uart401 after it gives me the missing symbol
errors, which never used to happen.
So, I think I remember a file in the RH5.0 /lib/modules directory (or
rather, the one that came with my machine) which told modutils about all
of the dependencies, and which I'm now missing, and I think this is
causing my problem. Do you know what this file is called, and what it
should contain? (Somehow the /lib/modules directory in my backup got
zapped!)
But now I have a new sound problem. I've only tried two sound programs,
esd/esdcat and drvmidi, and both run many times too fast. drvmidi runs
through a 2:32 file playing the first 2:27 in about 4 seconds, and the
last 5 seconds in real time, about 5 seconds. The pitches sound right
and the rhythms seem reasonable, it's just somehow on steroids.
The other program I've tried is esd/esdcat 0.2.6 with .wav files (the
ones that shipped with E 0.14), which is I think about 5-10 times too
fast, with accompanying too-high pitch. Has anyone used esd/esdcat on
alpha with an SB16? I know it has only recently become (officially)
64-bit clean...
Any ideas would be very much appreciated!!
Thanks again,
-Adam `Cold Fusion' Powell, IV http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/~powell/ ____
USDoC, National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) |\ ||< |
Center for Theoretical and Computational Materials Science | \||_> |
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]