[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: SX cache
- From: Bill Broadley <bill math ucdavis edu>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: SX cache
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1998 01:54:56 -0700
On Tue, Aug 31, 1999 at 11:53:09AM +0000, Shane Steven Sturrock wrote:
> I was wondering if there is any way to increase the cache on a
> 533SX above 1MB. We originally paid for an LX but the company
> sent us the SX and promptly folded so there is little we can do
> about getting what we wanted. We have since bought an LX from
> another company and that is proving to be 30% faster than the SX
> as expected. Is there any physical reason why the PC164SX only
> has 1MB cache and if it had 2MB would it perform in a similar
> manner to our LX?
>
> As for the LX, wow! Same video, UW-SCSI etc as the SX, but wow!
> It is so much more snappy. I wish I had one at home......
>
The SX has a 16k/16k L1 cache, and no onboard L2. The LX has 96k
of L2 cache running at full cpu speed. So while a larger cache
might help a bit, it's still not going to be as fast as the Lx.
Which company went out of business?
> Shane
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: send e-mail to axp-list-request@redhat.com with
> 'unsubscribe' as the subject. Do not send it to axp-list@redhat.com
- References:
- SX cache
- From: Shane Steven Sturrock <Shane.Sturrock@ed.ac.uk>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]