[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: MILO
- From: Bibek Sahu <scorpio dodds net>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: MILO
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1999 19:06:43 -0600 (CST)
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
> I've used both the Milo from gatekeeper and from alphalinux.org on
> my UDB and noticed something that's not true with the Milo on the RH6.0
> CD: neither of them could load vmlinuz when it's a symbolic link to the
> actual kernel. I know this isn't a major issue, but I'm curious as to why
> this "feature" was removed.
Actually, this 'feature' was never there. It'd be nice if it were,
though.
Also, if you look at the /etc/milo.conf that the RedHat installer
drops in, you'll notice that the milo that comes with RH6.0 doesn't use the
symlink. ;-) The fact that it puts the symlink in /boot just causes
confusion, but acomplishes nothing that I found.
- Bob
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MILO
- From: Adam K Kirchhoff <adamk@voicenet.com>
- Re: MILO
- From: Chris Kloiber <chris_kloiber@suth.com>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]