[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RH XFree86 spec file question
- From: Craig P Prescott <prescott phys ufl edu>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: RH XFree86 spec file question
- Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 23:01:33 -0500
Greets;
Was building XFree86 on my EV45 (aka 21064A) AlphaStation 250 last
night, and I was wondering why everything was getting compiled with
"-Wa,-m21164a". Then saw this in the spec file:
<snip>
%build
%ifarch alpha
make World -C xc CDEBUGFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Wa,-m21164a"
%else
</snip>
This was from
ftp://updates.redhat.com/6.0/SRPMS/XFree86-3.3.5-1.6.0.src.rpm
So I went over and grabbed XFree sources from Rawhide...
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/rawhide/SRPMS/SRPMS/XFree86-3.3.5-15.src.rpm
and took a look at the spec file. The alpha stanza of %build is thus:
%build
%ifarch alpha
make World -C xc CDEBUGFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Wa,-m21164a"
# we are having problems with the compiler on alpha.
make -C xc/programs/xterm CDEBUGFLAGS="-Wa,-m21164a"
make -C xc
rm xc/programs/xfs/os/io.o
pushd xc/programs/xfs/os
make CDEBUGFLAGS=""
cd ..
rm xfs
make CDEBUGFLAGS=""
popd
%else
In the spec file from XFree86-3.3.3.1-49.src.rpm (source rpm from
RH6.0), it is there, too:
%build
%ifarch alpha
make World -C xc CDEBUGFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS -Wa,-m21164a"
%else
Anyway, this just seemed kinda weird, so I thought I'd ask about it
(I'm sure I'll learn something). Anybody know what is up with this?
Just seems like a bad idea to tell the assembler (in my case) the
wrong chip...
Thanks in advance,
Craig
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]