[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Performance again
- From: Joseph Curtis <jc wasatch ps uci edu>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Performance again
- Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 20:49:57 -0800 (PST)
Another set of data points (note the DEC compiler _key point_):
using only DEC cc: on 333MHz Alpha
(limantour)home/jc% time perftest i
mixed int
0.182u 0.004s 0:00.19 94.7% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
(limantour)home/jc% time perftest f
float
0.649u 0.003s 0:00.65 98.4% 0+0k 0+0io 0pf+0w
(limantour)home/jc% time perftest d
double
0.391u 0.005s 0:00.39 100.0% 0+0k 0+1io 0pf+0w
using gcc: on 500MHz PC164
(wasatch)/home/jc/% gcc preftest.c -o perftest
(wasatch)/home/jc/% time perftest i
mixed int
2.939u 0.003s 0:06.13 47.7% 0+0k 0+0io 67pf+0w
(wasatch)/home/jc/% time perftest f
float
0.906u 0.003s 0:02.07 43.4% 0+0k 0+0io 67pf+0w
(wasatch)/home/jc/% time perftest d
double
1.279u 0.004s 0:02.50 50.8% 0+0k 0+0io 67pf+0w
using DEC cc (-non_shared) on 500MHz PC164
(wasatch)/home/jc/% time perftest_ns i
mixed int
0.122u 0.000s 0:00.51 23.5% 0+0k 0+0io 15pf+0w
(wasatch)/home/jc/% time perftest_ns f
float
0.432u 0.001s 0:00.99 43.4% 0+0k 0+0io 12pf+0w
(wasatch)/home/jc/% time perftest_ns d
double
0.261u 0.001s 0:00.46 56.5% 0+0k 0+0io 12pf+0w
*******************************************************************************
Joseph E. Curtis Office: 949-824-7473
Department of Chemistry Pager: 714-238-0557
590 Physical Sciences I Fax: 949-824-8571
University of California E-mail: curtisj@uci.edu
Irvine, California 92697-2025 http://CX290227-A.msnv1.occa.home.com
*******************************************************************************
On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, Herwin Jan Steehouwer wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 1999, geerten kuiper wrote:
>
> > Herwin Jan,
> >
> > Some ideas:
> >
> > - as always, much depends on what your program is trying to do.
> > - make shure you use the improved math libraries (I think
> > <http://people.frankfurt.netsurf.de/Joachim.Wesner/libffm.0.28.tar.gz>
> > has the latest.)
> > - David Mosberger once wrote an article on optimizing code for Alpha. You
> > may be able to find it somewhere on the web. Cache optimization is the main
> > thing to realize the Alphas full potential.
>
> i cannot find him ;-( also his e-mail adres i found, was not working ;(
>
> > - using 64 bit floats will probably be almost as fast as 32 bits (contrary
> > to your PentiumII, where it will be much slower.)
>
> ok, will try that !
>
> > - on some older Alpha boxes, memory bandwith limits performance. On your XL
> > this should be less of an issue (is it 128 or 256 bits wide ?)
>
> 366Xl is 128 bits wide !
>
> a test programm ( see attachment ) will give this output ! how can i speed
> this up ?? ( gcc -o preftest preftest.c ) NO optimizing for this test !
>
> SGI 100 Mhz R4k:
> time perftest i
> 7.359
> time perftest f
> 3.534
> time perftest d
> 4.942
>
> Alpha 233 Mhz:
> time perftest i
> 9.140
> time perftest f
> 2.290u
> time perftest d
> 3.050u
>
> Intel P2 300Mhz:
> time perftest i
> 1.955
> time perftest f
> 1.555
> time perftest d
> 2.614
>
>
> tanx
> HJ
>
> Herwin Jan Steehouwer
> herwinjs@palet.nl http://www.caiw.nl/~herwinjs
> steehouwer@kde.org KDE developer http://www.kde.org
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: send e-mail to axp-list-request@redhat.com with
> 'unsubscribe' as the subject. Do not send it to axp-list@redhat.com
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]