[no subject]

But also, as I've stated in a post a long time ago... if RedHat people 
are too busy to test the distribution, they should release a 
no-guarantee (or implied), "beta" distribution and let others test and 
submit results. Perhaps offer volunteer "beta-testers" a free RH box 
once it is "officially" released? I know the rawhide site seems to be 
doing something like this... but how much feedback does redhat get?

Overall, if RedHat, or Linux in general wants to penetrate into the 
market of corporate computing, these kind of things need to be fixed.

D
>
>With regards to your message at 01:06 PM 01-11-99 PST, Designer 7. 
Where
>you stated:
>>Now, that is something I don't understand... if the ipfwadm works with 
>>5.0 then why does RH insist on bundling a broken ipfwadm with 5.1 and 
>>5.2? The only difference is that the release number of the ipfwadm 
with 
>>5.2 and 5.1 is higher (perhaps a patch?). I just don't understand...
>
>Me neither, but then why did they also include a broken DHCPCD binary 
on 5.2?
>All this makes hooking up a machine to a network an "interesting" 
proposition.
>All I can say is that it looks like they actually "test" very little, 
if
>any of this software on anything _but_ a "standard" ethernet to a hub. 
If
>you use a modem, cable-modem, ISDN, or anything else like that it is an
>uphill battle with 5.2


______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com