[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: January 19, 2038
- From: "Adam C. Powell, IV" <adam powell nist gov>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: January 19, 2038
- Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 18:23:34 -0500
Bob Taylor wrote:
> Exactly how many 32 bit machines do you think will still be in *use* in
> the year 2037?
Hmm. Isn't this the kind of thinking that got us into our current trouble?
With Linux being used in a lot of embedded devices, some of which I'm sure
will be around in 40 years, this approach is not especially helpful.
Fortunately, the issue isn't 32-bit vs. 64-bit computers, but 32 vs. 64-bit
__time_t. If this is fixed in the glibc (and people don't do stupid things
like casting to/from ints), then we're all set, right?
Zeen,
-Adam `Cold Fusion' Powell, IV http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/~powell/ ____
USDoC, National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST) |\ ||< |
Center for Theoretical and Computational Materials Science | \||_> |
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]