[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Mozilla for Alpha ( was netscape for Alpha)
- From: Bharadwaj Yadavalli <sby ives lkg dec com>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Mozilla for Alpha ( was netscape for Alpha)
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 1999 14:42:57 -0500 (EDT)
> This really is a faq..
I hope it does not remain one :-)
> On Tue, Jun 15, 1999 at 03:56:28PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> > Why are there no netscape binaries for Alpha?
>
> There are aplenty of 32 vs. 64-bit issues in Netscape source,
> and gcc does not support "-taso" compilation as DEC CC does.
> (with 32-bit pointer addresses..) Essentially the initial
> Mozilla ( = Netscape 4.0 ) source did show that it contains
> *a lot* of code with implied assumption that pointers are 32-
> bit objects.
>
> During the Mozilla effort, a lot of these things have been
> fixed, and therefore the Mozilla works (to a degree) at Alpha.
Let me also vigorously agree with the above statements. I have been
successfully building Mozilla on a Linux/Alpha almost on a daily basis
since the last couple of weeks. While it certainly is still
work-in-progress and core dumps every once in a while, several of the
components are working rather nicely (If only we could fix it to work
over http proxies.... hopefully soon, I guess...).
If each one who desires a browser (and cares to build one) starts
running Mozilla, Linux/Alpha will have one less application package
whose availability is "roumored" to be non-existant !! It will
certainly increase the user base and clean bugs :-) There is always
Amaya, though.
Just my 2 cents worth thoughts and experiences,
Bharadwaj
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]