Re: Need JDK1.1.7 compiled against RH6.0 glibc 2.x for Alpha

[Alexander Fry <afry obscure org>]

Thanks for the reply on this subject.  I did get jdk1.1.8 and have had no
problems running it so far.

On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Uncle George wrote:

> > >
> > > I appreciate the effort put forth by the JDK/Linux/Alpha porters.
> > > However, the JDK 1.1.x series has to come up to par with the i386
> > > releases. This effort is critical for ApacheJserv as well as other
> > > products.  Thanks for your assistance and quick response.
> > >
> > > -Alexander Fry <afry@obscure.org>
> 
> In reality there is only ONE person that is/has done the Linux/JAVA port of
> SUN's software on the alpha. I get no support from DEC, or from SUN et al.  But
> NOW that sun wont relicense my NON-COMMercial license for JDK 1.2,  I am
> thinking that they will also stop licensing  the non-comm JDK1.1.x,  ( at any
> time ). ergo why support suns incursions, and i will move on to other things
> that need help ( like the alpha port of postgreSQL, or mauve  ) . I dont have
> the Peso's to go commercial, or the time to prove that 32bit JAVA testing
> facilities ( needed to pass certification ) is biased agains 64bit machines.
> BTW DEC has done the JDK ports to alpha/true64 - maybe u should be asking them
> as they seem to have the bucks to put in front of suns marketeers
> gat

I appreciate all your hard work. This JDK is invaluable to my development
efforts right now.  The Postgresql port would also be a great endeavor in
any case.

> -- 
> To unsubscribe: send e-mail to axp-list-request@redhat.com with
> 'unsubscribe' as the subject.  Do not send it to axp-list@redhat.com
> 

-Alexander Fry <afry@obscure.org> http://www.obscure.org/~afry/
----------------------------------------------------------------