[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: i hate my tulip based NIC card !!
- From: Izaak Bozof <izaak bozof ins com>
- To: axp-list redhat com, axp-list redhat com
- Cc: lars execpc com
- Subject: Re: i hate my tulip based NIC card !!
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 1999 22:18:35 -0400
I have several Digital 10/100 PCI nics that are 21143-PC based and SRM
recognises them and they work beautifully.
You can set all their features from SRM (i.e. full/half duplex, 10/100 bt,
etc). I have them in an AS200, in a UDB, and in a PC164 based system.
I highly recommend them.
izaak
At 07:23 p 9/1/99 , lars@execpc.com wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 01:53:54PM -0700, greg meno wrote:
>>
>> as you can see by the title i'm not to impressed with the kingston 10/100
>> NIC, ddoes anyone have suggestions for a fast ethernet card that works with
>> alpha linux
>> -GReg
>>
>
>Depends on what you're trying to do. If you're booting with SRM and
>you want to get the nic card to be recognized from there.. good
>luck. I haven't found much in the way of cards that work with SRM. I
>did find an old SMC 9332DST that works reasonably well, but newer
>versions of the 21140 chipset just don't fly. Incidentally, if anyone
>knows of any other nics that work from SRM, I'd like to hear about it.
>
>If you don't care about the console recognizing your nic, I've found
>that the boomerang 3com cards (3c905?!) worked fairly well.
>
>--
>Ryan Schaefer
>lars@execpc.com
>
>--
>To unsubscribe: send e-mail to axp-list-request@redhat.com with
>'unsubscribe' as the subject. Do not send it to axp-list@redhat.com
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]