[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: i hate my tulip based NIC card !!
- From: "Sean Hunter" <sean uncarved co uk>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: i hate my tulip based NIC card !!
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 1999 09:11:42 +0100
[sean@diego sean]$ netstat -i
Kernel Interface table
Iface MTU Met RX-OK RX-ERR RX-DRP RX-OVR TX-OK TX-ERR TX-DRP TX-OVR Flg
eth0 1500 0 166463 0 0 0 227692 0 0 0 BRU
eth1 1500 0 667348 0 0 0 889860 0 0 0 BRU
lo 8020 0 756325 0 0 0 756325 0 0
0 LRU
eth0: Digital DS21142/3 Tulip at 0x8000, 00 00 f0 51 05 d6, IRQ 44.
eth1: 3Com 3c905B Cyclone 100baseTx at 0x9800, 00:50:04:65:a0:d6, IRQ 19
I never have any problems with either card. I don't need them in the
SRM, though. They get much higher packet counts normally, but I've
rebooted to a new kernel a couple of days ago.
Sean
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 01:53:54PM -0700, greg meno wrote:
> as you can see by the title i'm not to impressed with the kingston 10/100
> NIC, ddoes anyone have suggestions for a fast ethernet card that works with
> alpha linux
> -GReg
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe: send e-mail to axp-list-request@redhat.com with
> 'unsubscribe' as the subject. Do not send it to axp-list@redhat.com
>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]