[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Intel "easier" than Alpha? (was: XFree86 4.0)
- From: Charles E Taylor IV <charlet hubcap clemson edu>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Intel "easier" than Alpha? (was: XFree86 4.0)
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 08:16:48 -0500 (EST)
On 11-Mar-00 Mitchell Blank Jr wrote:
> Kids these days. If you're going to play my-distribution-is-older you should
> at least have used either SLS or boot/root.
At that time, though, I didn't even own a PC. I was using an Amiga. Linux
just wasn't very interesting until it got too expensive and bothersome to keep
the Amiga up to speed.
> By the time Slackware was the dominant distro, kernel 1.0.0 was out...
> where's
> the fun in that? :-)
Was busy having fun with the Amiga, ;)
> ObOnTopic: I'm somewhat in the same boat as Dan - I always had a thing for
> DEC hardware (and I still can't bring myself to call them Compaq).
Oh well, at least they seem to be trying.
---
--------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: Charles E Taylor IV <charlet@hubcap.clemson.edu>
<charlet@innova.net>
Date: 11-Mar-00
Time: 08:07:27
--------------------------------------------------------
Visit me on the web!
http://orangesherbert.ces.clemson.edu
--------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]