[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
RE: Everyone's SRM woes
- From: Daniel Potts <danielp cse unsw edu au>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: RE: Everyone's SRM woes
- Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:24:26 +1100 (EST)
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001 KirkE@paccessglobal.com wrote:
> PALcode is the biggest sticking point all the way around. Alpha architecture
> requires it, so he who controls the PALcode and SRM licenses controls all.
> I have never been able to get a good answer out of Samsung/API whether their
> free reign over Alpha architecture permits them similar access to SRM and
> PALcode, I would only assume so.
You could always write your own. The biggest issue after getting it to
work is knowing/discovering the work arounds for various CPU bugs that may
pop up. I guess that Compaq would be much less willing to tell people
about these than releasing an example or working PALcode that people
can freely* use (SDK 4.0 etc).
Cheers,
Daniel
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]