Re: are 512 byte block still an issue? (WAS: installing rh 7.0)

[Sebastian Moeller <sebastian moeller lur rwth-aachen de>]

Oops I just found an "s" on my table. I guess it must have fallen from the
subject line while I was not looking... (the letter would just look
nice after block; and sorry for the bandwidth pollution.)
	

On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Sebastian Moeller wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2001, Iwao Makino wrote:
> 
> > It has to have 512block(like NeXT required 1024), otherwise, it will give 
> > you all sorts of
> > strange problems soon or later.
> 
> I would like to ask whether this holds true for all alphas? And if not
> which machines can boot from cd-roms with different blocksizes. (And
> maybe this information would fit well into the axp-mailing archives.)
> 
> 
> TIA
> 	Sebastian Moeller
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Axp-list mailing list
> Axp-list@redhat.com
> https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
>