[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Memory for LX164
- From: "Calvin Coghlan" <ccoghlan ascensionhealth org>
- To: <axp-list redhat com>
- Subject: Re: Memory for LX164
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 12:53:21 -0500
I thought it was because the cache chips on board SX could not handle the address greater than 512. Not the chipset. Could be wrong going from memory here.
Calvin.
>>> ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru 10/12/01 12:32PM >>>
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 01:03:26PM -0400, Rich Payne wrote:
> Hmmm....excellent question. I think that it's still 512 as it was a
> limitation of the chipset implementation, but I could be wrong as I've
> never tried putting >512 into an SX.
SX164 has exactly the same core logic chipset as LX164, so 1Gb
should work.
Ivan.
_______________________________________________
Axp-list mailing list
Axp-list@redhat.com
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
NOTE: This e-mail message may contain information that may be privileged,
confidential, and exempt from disclosure. It is intended for use only by
the person to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message in
error, please do not forward or use this information in any way, delete it
immediately, and contact the sender as soon as possible by the reply option
or by telephone at the telephone number listed (if available). Thank you.
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]