Re: rhn_register failure

["'Bryce'" <bryce redhat com>]

Rich Payne wrote:

> > also 7.1 on two up2000's (2x ev67 667, ev67 667)... up2date seems to
> > work fine also on a DS10 (ev6 466) up2date seems to work fine I've
> > also got an sx164 (ev56 533)... up2date also appears to work fine
>
> SX is actually pca56.

ok ok 8) mr pedantic 8)

> > fly in the ointment
> > 7.1 (ev67 600) on a Nautilus,.. up2date flakes out.
>
> Wow....that's a strange one.....this is exactly the same chip as used in
> the UP2000s above, only difference would be the cache size (4mb vs 2mb for
> nautilus).

> Could this be a glibc difference? One is running the normal glibc, the
> other is running the ev6 version? Thought that wouldn't explain the
> original post as he was on a PWS600au (aka ev56).

Well the Nautilus and the ds10 and the up2000's are all running with an ev6
version
-rwxr-xr-x    2 root     root      9881323 Jun  6 14:27 /lib/libc-2.2.3.so

wheras the sx164 is running with the normal non ev6 lib
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root      9933148 Jun  6 13:33 /lib/libc-2.2.3.so

Hummmm
you could try forcefully installing the non ev6 libc and see if that helps.
There might be a minor slowdown, however, in realistic use, it's not likely
you'd notice
the differance.

Phil
=--=