[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: Hammer (2)
- From: Bryan-TheBS-Smith <b j smith ieee org>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: Hammer (2)
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:54:19 -0400
W Bauske wrote:
> Alphas aren't particularly close at 784. (DS20E/833 is the
> fastest Alpha at SpecFP2000)
Of course, beside clock speed, you should consider "feature size."
Most Alphas are stuck at 0.25-0.35um, whereas Intel, AMD and IBM
have dropped to 0.18 and even 0.13um in many cases.
I find it very interesting that a 667 Alpha 264 can "hold its own"
against a 733 or even 800 Itanium.
Secondly, it is important to note that Intel's "good" Spec numbers
are using their optimizing compiler. Whip out GCC and the story is
different, even with Intel funded optimizations.
-- TheBS
--
Bryan "TheBS" Smith mailto:b.j.smith@ieee.org chat:thebs413
Engineer AbsoluteValue Systems, Inc. http://www.linux-wlan.org
President SmithConcepts, Inc. http://www.SmithConcepts.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
Web site defacements are as much of a national security risk as
inner city kids spray painting. There is nothing of value, and
nothing that can't be fixed with a little re-paint. You'd have
to have the equivalent stupidity of someone parking an F-18 in
downtown LA. Even then, the only damage would be a new scheme!
The US government wants life imprisonment for such "terrorism."
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]