[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: DS20L
- From: Michael Huntingdon <hunting ix netcom com>
- To: axp-list redhat com
- Subject: Re: DS20L
- Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 13:33:54 -0700
At 08:39 AM 5/30/2002 -0600, you wrote:
>With regards to your message at 07:23 AM 5/30/02, Rich Payne. Where you stated:
>> > They got stuck with a ton of these and the parts.
>> > API built them and they wouldn't sell.
>>
>>Interesting the you seem to know exactly what API sold.
>Only quoting what API sales people and other dealers said..
>And based on our own results too, naturally.
>One of the big sticking points when CS20 came out is that the were
>initially offered with NO warranty.
> > And they still won't sell.
>> > And they still overheat..
>>
>>Sigh.....I think I can say, with some safety, that I (as well as a few
>>of my former co-workers) have seen and used more
>>of these things (CS20) than most people on this list, and I can state that
>>there was no overheating problem with these. In fact the 833MHz version
>>was overcooled as the case was designed to also use 667MHz CPUs which ran
>>hotter (EV67 vs. EV68).
>
>I have set these up to run customer benchmarks twice now.
>Once a long time ago, and once just two weeks ago.
>Both times, when room temperature rose to about 25C after a few hours I had
>stalled machines.
>On the last go I ended up putting a room fan in front to blow over them,
>and it "fixed" the problem.
>I think that in a 20C air-conditioned room they will be fine, but at 25C
>they get "iffy".
Seems to me "iffy" is a compute environment that is not designed to maintain room temperatures below 80 degrees, rather than going and staying above 80 for hours.
>
>>There are several people on this list that worked very hard on the CS20
>>project and I for one can say that I don't appreciate people making false
>>statements about it. Was it perfect? No, of course not, no product is
>>perfect, they all have their faults, but in the case of the CS20, over
>>heating was not one of them.
>
>
>I understand a lot of work went in to these.
>The tooling for some of the metal pieces alone must have cost quite a
>chunk. and the power supply probably was a ton of work to design for this.
>The Linux bootloader was also obviously a big job.
>
>I also believe that they could have been a big success, if they were
>marketed properly.
>But when they were released they were a bear to configure, were offered
>with no warranty, were offered at a 15% price premium over the cost of
>fully configuring a UP2000+ based machine, and could not run TRU64.
>We consistently saw customer disapproval, from people who were still buying
>UP2000+ based machines.
Would you not have to apply that 15% premium to the cost of additional cabinets, mounting hardware, power/UPS products and the like were it not for the low profile of the cs/ds20L? The numbers seem to work.
cheers
~m
>
>
>With our best regards,
>
>Maurice W. Hilarius Telephone: 01-780-456-9771
>Hard Data Ltd. FAX: 01-780-456-9772
>11060 - 166 Avenue mailto:maurice@harddata.com
>Edmonton, AB, Canada http://www.harddata.com/
> T5X 1Y3
>
>Ask me about the UP1500 Alpha - Full systems from $3,500!
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Axp-list mailing list
>Axp-list@redhat.com
>https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
>
*********************************************************************
Systems Performance Consultants
Michael Huntingdon
Higher Education Technology Office (707) 545-0948
131-A Stony Circle, Suite 500 Cell (707) 478-0226
Santa Rosa, CA 95401 fax (707) 577-7419
Web: <http://www.spcnet.com> hunting@ix.netcom.com
*********************************************************************
- References:
- Re: DS20L
- From: Rich Payne <rdp@talisman.mv.com>
- Re: DS20L
- From: Maurice Hilarius <maurice@harddata.com>
- Re: DS20L
- From: Maurice Hilarius <maurice@harddata.com>
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
[]