On Thursday 15 March 2007 16:56, Jay Estabrook wrote: > On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 07:39:41PM +0300, Sergey Tikhonov wrote: > > Oliver Falk wrote: > > > > >dmidecode is only available for i386 and x86_64, therefor we should > > >ifarch the req for dmidecode out in lm_sensors, shouldn't we? > > > > > >What do you think about this: > > >Index: lm_sensors.spec > > >=================================================================== > > >RCS file: /cvs/dist/devel/lm_sensors/lm_sensors.spec,v > > >retrieving revision 1.43 > > >diff -r1.43 lm_sensors.spec > > >19a20 > > >> %ifarch i386 x86_64 > > >20a22 > > >> %endif > > > > > >I wonder this hasn't been done already, as it will make problems with > > >ia64, ppc and so on as well. :-/ > > > > > >'Zilla this one also!? > > > > I would say yes. :) I just ran sensors and sensors-detect to see that > > they just say no sensors found. Which is fine. > > If I remember correctly the lm_sensors itself was required some gnome > > package. > > Well, not GNOME, but... > > [jestabro jaye3 ~]$ rpm -e --test lm_sensors > error: Failed dependencies: > libsensors.so.3 is needed by (installed) kdebase-3.5.4-0.5.fc5.alpha > > Sergey, I think you're remembering the circular dependencies of > "pilot-link" and GNOME... ;-} ohh ... thats why we need an automated build sistem ... If i touch a low level lib i am sick to rebuild whole bunch of packages wich depend over this. ;-) just added +1 point for reasonings. > > --Jay++ > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Jay A Estabrook HPTC - XC I & B > Hewlett-Packard Company - ZKO1-3/D-B.8 (603) 884-0301 > 110 Spit Brook Road, Nashua NH 03062 Jay Estabrook hp com > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________ > axp-list mailing list > axp-list redhat com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list > -- Balint Cristian (Red Hat Release Engineering Team)
Attachment:
pgpQgKobsHD8q.pgp
Description: PGP signature