Re: Fedora 8-based distro for Alpha CD Announcement

[Jay Estabrook <Jay Estabrook hp com>]

Hi, Carl,

Sorry about that... :-\

I've a feeling it may have to do with the extra "isomarkboot" that
gets done to make it bootable on Alpha.

I made sure to md5sum AFTER I did the above; that is what is in the
MD5SUM.Fedora-etc file that accompanies the ISO.

Probably just something I missed in the ecstasy that is "anaconda"...

;-} ;-}

--Jay++

Carl Lowenstein wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 7:06 AM, Jay Estabrook <Jay Estabrook hp com> wrote:
>> Hi, folks,
>>
>>  After an almost interminable wait (:-), the most recent
>>  final release candidate for our own Fedora 8-based distro
>>  for Alpha is now available at:
>>
>>   http://buildsys.zero42.at/iso/Fedora-20080404-alpha-CD.iso
>  . . .
>>  Additional information about the build system, repositories,
>>  current state of our Fedora 9 for Alpha testing, etc, are on:
>>
>>   http://buildsys.zero42.at/
> . . .
> 
> Minor nitpick.  The embedded checksum in the ISO image seems not to
> pass the mediacheck test as implemented in
> anaconda-runtime/checkisomd5.
> 
> On the other hand, the whole image passes when tested against
> MD5SUM.Fedora-20080404-alpha-CD as found among the "additional
> information".
> 
> I don't remember whether I have previously tested the Alpha ISO images
> using "checkisomd5".  Now I have to find the time to visit and update
> my DS10.
> 
>     carl
> --
>  carl lowenstein marine physical lab u.c. san diego
>  clowenstein ucsd edu
> 
> _______________________________________________
> axp-list mailing list
> axp-list redhat com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/axp-list
>